Anyhow, a sudoku variant this week which I think I’m right in claiming has only ever been pulled off by yours truly – although please correct me if I’m wrong. In case you missed the original post the idea with 10’s sudoku is normal sudoku rules, except that every time a pair of adjacent cells had digits summing to 10, they are marked. Where there are no markings between adjacent cells, the conclusion is then that the relevant digits cannot sum to 10.
Prior to that post, I can’t find an example where 10’s sudoku had no such marked occurrences between pairs of digits, but it turns out with a bit of work that it’s perfectly possible. I’m sure a computer-y type would easily be able to write a program to churn out more of these without working up any sort of a sweat, but that’s not the way I roll. There’s plenty of potential with this variant to churn out some really fiendish challenges; this example is fairly plain sailing, but perhaps with a couple of surprises along the way. Enjoy!
UPDATE: My apologies to those who had a go at an earlier version of this puzzle, which had two solutions, and my thanks to Jack who pointed this apparently obvious blooper I managed to completely miss! My reputation for errors seems to be growing, but stick with me anyway – at the very least you won’t be bored!
#065 No Tens Sudoku – rated mediumAll puzzles © Tom Collyer 2009-10
Er, I’m not getting a unique solution. Specifically, I see two ways of sorting out the placement of the 1’s and 9’s in some of the corner blocks.ReplyDelete
Blah – you’d have thought I’d have at least been able to get a sudoku right – but no, you’re exactly right. I totally need to test solve these :\ReplyDelete
Anyhow, I’ll take this down and get this fixed in the morning.
Thanks for your feedback :)
Sod the morning – I clearly couldn’t let something like this get in the way of something as trivial as sleep. This updated version is good!ReplyDelete